Vehicle Integration · Contact-Point & Clash Analysis
Technical concepts from virtual vehicle integration
A visual explanation of how geometric relationships are investigated, classified, prioritised and carried into the next virtual build phase.
BMW AG · Munich · Working student · 04/2024–04/2025
Schematic · Illustrative · Not to scaleFig. A1. Synthetic automotive assembly. Illustrative inspection geometry. Not proprietary CAD. Not to scale.
Conceptual readout
- Analysis state
- Inspection node
- Geometry
- Synthetic assembly
- View
- Node A
- Status
- Synthetic
- Data
- None published
Node A marks the contact point under investigation. The surrounding assembly is ghosted.
- CATIA V5Contact-point and clash analysis on virtual full-vehicle assemblies, across different vehicle projects.
- AI-assisted analysisI contributed to an AI-assisted analysis. I did not develop or train the model.
- The visualsOriginal synthetic schematics of the method. They are not BMW material.
- Solid = my contribution
- Hatched = wider system
- Dashed = synthetic
- Redacted = not published
- Node A = the one point followed on this page
A contact point starts as a geometric relationship
Move the control. The same two parts go from clear, to close, to contact, to clash.
The figure needs JavaScript. States: clear, close, contact, clash.
Schematic · Illustrative · Not to scaleFig. A2. A geometric relationship is not automatically an engineering issue.
One contact point, four ways to look at it
In CATIA V5 a contact point can be examined from several views. This station uses a generic specimen, not a CATIA screen.
The figure needs JavaScript. Views: assembly, section, distance, contact.
Schematic · Illustrative · Not to scaleFig. A3. The same Node A in every view.
From a full assembly to one contact point
A virtual full-vehicle assembly has many parts and many relationships. Clash analysis narrows the field to candidate interactions.
The figure needs JavaScript. Modes: assembly, show contacts, show clashes, isolate node.
Schematic · Illustrative · Not to scaleFig. A4. Generic blocks, not a vehicle. Marker count is illustrative.
A geometric relationship is not automatically an issue
Whether a contact point is relevant is a judgement that follows investigation.
The figure needs JavaScript. Stages: geometric relationship, investigation, relevance screen.
Schematic · Illustrative · Not to scaleFig. A5. The screen exists. Its criteria and outcomes are not published.
Four ways to describe a relevant contact point
Relevant points are classified by type. Select a type to see the concept on the specimen.
The figure needs JavaScript. Types: clearance, collision, joining technique, surface properties.
Schematic · Illustrative · Not to scaleFig. A6. Concepts only. No real case is classified.
Points are weighed, not just listed
Relevant contact points are weighted by criticality. The scale is qualitative and no point is placed on it here.
The figure needs JavaScript. Stages: points for prioritisation, toward the scale, scale with no positions assigned.
Schematic · Illustrative · Not to scaleFig. A7. Qualitative scale. No rankings, no values.
Each relevant contact point gets a problem report
A report records the contact point, its classification, its criticality, the issue and the follow-up. This one is a synthetic structure.
Fields shown: contact point, classification, criticality, engineering issue, measure, follow-up.
Schematic · Illustrative · Not to scaleFig. A8. A report template drawn from scratch. Not BMW's format.
The task continues in the next virtual build phase
Validation of defined measures happens in the digital model only.
Defined measures can be checked again in the next virtual build phase.
One contribution inside a larger system
I contributed to an AI-assisted contact-point analysis by generating representative failure examples in CATIA V5. I did not develop or train the model.
What the engineering record contains, and what this page shows
The work was done on proprietary vehicle data. What this page can show is the method.
Select a row for the reason. The bars never open.
Available on this page
- Concepts
- Workflow
- Engineering reasoning
- Generic schematics
- My contribution
This page makes no claim about acoustic results, measurements or physical testing.
What I did, as a map
Select a node. Solid outline is my contribution as a working student.
- Employer
- BMW AG, Munich
- Role
- Working student
- Period
- 04/2024–04/2025
- Department
- Funktionale Gestaltung, Integration, Störgeräusche
- Context
- Contact-point analysis on virtual full vehicles; rattle and squeak (road-induced noise)
- Tool
- CATIA V5